Jump to content
Heritage Owners Club

Pics: 2000 Millie SAE


tulk1

Recommended Posts

Well, it finally turned nice (eh, beautiful!!) weather outside. So, to that end I took the Millie SAE out and shot some pics. Just a bit of background to refresh the memory modules. Got this off the 'bay about 6 weeks ago. It's an SAE, which the specs say is a flat back, laminate top. But ... mine is arched back and top. The top may be laminate. But do the boys even do an arched lam?

 

Pics:

 

In the Case

width=600 height=347http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-incase2.jpg[/img]

width=600 height=450http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-incase.jpg[/img]

 

Arched Top:

mil-sae-arch2.jpg

width=600 height=450http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-arch1.jpg[/img]

 

Arched Back:

width=600 height=227http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-archback.jpg[/img]

width=234 height=480http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-back1.jpg[/img]

 

Inside the F-Hole:

width=545 height=480http://eriador1.com/MillieSAE/mil-sae-fhole-close.jpg[/img]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it finally turned nice (eh, beautiful!!) weather outside. So, to that end I took the Millie SAE out and shot some pics. Just a bit of background to refresh the memory modules. Got this off the 'bay about 6 weeks ago. It's an SAE, which the specs say is a flat back, laminate top. But ... mine is arched back and top. The top may be laminate. But do the boys even do an arched lam?

 

tulk ...

 

The Kenny Burrell Grove Master is an arch top /back laminate

http://www.heritageguitar.com/GrooveMaster.htm

 

I think the H-525 PTD is also a laminate top, it's hard to find detailed info on that model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tulk ...

 

The Kenny Burrell Grove Master is an arch top /back laminate

http://www.heritageguitar.com/GrooveMaster.htm

 

I think the H-525 PTD is also a laminate top, it's hard to find detailed info on that model.

 

Well, if it is a laminate, it would put it right there in good company with the 525 and KB GM, eh? Not that I'd like it any less, either.

Kinda reminds me of the late 60s- late 70s when Gibby didn't keep very good records of their models. Widh the boys would put something in the guitar somewhere when the model differs from the specs. Should would help us down the road.  :undecided:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that looks like a laminate to me. my 158 is an arched top/back laminate. Nothing wrong with that. Actually laminates are stronger.(and cheaper). no need for back access if it's got f-holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tulk, that's one damn nice looking guitar.  I would slap cream rings, nipple and gold knobs on it.  I think that would make the wood shine more.  Man, it is slick as is!  What does the neck feel like? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tulk, that's one damn nice looking guitar.  I would slap cream rings, nipple and gold knobs on it.  I think that would make the wood shine more.  Man, it is slick as is!  What does the neck feel like? 

 

I do like the creme surrounds, etc. Might do that some day.

 

The only millenium that has arched back is the H-158, so it looks like you got an extra 158 and they labeled it an SAE? Or they just goofed up. Either way thats a great guitar.

 

Thats what I was getting at. This guitar should have a flat back, but it doesn't. The label on the inside says "SAE" and that is about it. I took a pic of the label, but apparently didn't resize that one for posting. Might do that later tonite. It's definitely an SAE - Stereo Acoustic Electric. Works and sounds great! You have to boost the acoustic side a bit, tho'. The neck is one of the thinner style. I could use a fatter neck on it. But I'm getting used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  I would call it a millennium 158 SAE.

 

mine is labeled 'Millenium 158' and is the same except for the sae.

 

http://www.cjod.net/photos/heritage/heritage.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno. Something about yours just doesn't look Right.

 

:angel:

 

 

 

Seriously: They are very similar aren't they? Iit looks like your pup surrounds are on backwards. Is that just the angle of the pic, maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno. Something about yours just doesn't look Right.

 

bahhhh!    go ahead and say it :  'sinister'

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sinister

 

pickup rings ? hmmm. dunno , they slant towards the neck, so I think they is proper .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 karma for everyone who posted a picture in this thread...makes me want to go get my Milly DC out and play it.

 

does that include posting a link to a picture ? , cause I was debating whether I should copy/paste it or link it. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my Millie - note the pickup rings slant towards the neck and the f-holes indicate a solid top

 

neat!, I'm wondering what is the rationale of a flat back? Seems like an arched back would be extra work to create, yet your model is higher end- I'm guessing that it allows them to have solid front and back, whereas a carved/arched  front back might be somehow a structural compromise ?  Also , is the carved top two pieces ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to the pickup ring, it's not the proper angle on the millies for the bridge pickup. It drives me nuts to look at it as the angle is just wrong. The carved top should be the word on quality but let us come up with some data before making the determination that solid carved v laminate is a benefit. I think what tulk has here is pure production frankenstein. They either mis-labeled it or they had some excess here or there that they moved into production as another model. I would call that a rare bird and hopefully it sounds nice too. Twenty years into the amero that will be worth some kind of fiat money :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to the pickup ring, it's not the proper angle on the millies for the bridge pickup. It drives me nuts to look at it as the angle is just wrong. The carved top should be the word on quality but let us come up with some data before making the determination that solid carved v laminate is a benefit. I think what tulk has here is pure production frankenstein. They either mis-labeled it or they had some excess here or there that they moved into production as another model. I would call that a rare bird and hopefully it sounds nice too. Twenty years into the amero that will be worth some kind of fiat money :)

 

I think I like what you just said.  8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

neat!, I'm wondering what is the rationale of a flat back? Seems like an arched back would be extra work to create, yet your model is higher end- I'm guessing that it allows them to have solid front and back, whereas a carved/arched  front back might be somehow a structural compromise ?  Also , is the carved top two pieces ?

 

The top is indeed a two piece ... you can see that clearer in this picture

 

width=600 height=450http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh98/SouthpawGuy/millennium2.jpg[/img]

 

As for the flat back I'm guessing that as the Millie is of chambered construction as opposed to a semi hollow it was found work better for contructing the guitar and for creating the rear access panel.  ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to the pickup ring, it's not the proper angle on the millies for the bridge pickup. It drives me nuts to look at it as the angle is just wrong. ....  will be worth some kind of fiat money :)

 

mmmm. not seeing it. looks proper to me - angled towards the headstock, matching the general direction of the 'action' . right ?

 

'fiat' money ? I'm hoping for Maserati myself, or at least Alpha. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...