guitarjump Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 I saw an ad on ebay for an H-150 that obviously has a two-piece back: http://cgi.ebay.com/HERITAGE-H-150CM-W-ORI...1QQcmdZViewItem On the Heritage website site the description for H-150's is "solid mahogany" body. I suppose I'd assumed this meant one piece. Is there any way to tell if an H-150 model would be a one-piece or two piece body? Is this random? I know with G* models these days (for Standards, at least) it's a crapshoot. Thanks, in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 A wonderful luthier I asked this question said it does not make much difference sound wise if you have a one or a two piece body. There is a disadvantage with singular piece of body wood: if the particular wood has not aged it may start to 'work' in a way you will not like. So I wouldn't worry about two pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersteel Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 My H150CM LW has a 1-piece back. The other one I used to have had a 2-piece back. The only difference, IMHO, is visual. Some "purists" over at the LP Forum have a different opinion, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brentrocks Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 i think my gary moore is a 1 piece? i didnt thimk Heritage did a 2-piece? i guess they do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuz Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I have never seen a 2 piece mahogany back on a Heritage either???!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 well...my 150 and my VIP2 do have the two pieces and again it is not necessarily a sign of better quality it is probably one more example of internet LP forum balderdash of the long neck tenon category let's send our correspondent Brent to discuss this at Parsons St. - I mean the boys there have dealt with a lot of famous guitars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikenov Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I saw an ad on ebay for an H-150 that obviously has a two-piece back:http://cgi.ebay.com/HERITAGE-H-150CM-W-ORI...1QQcmdZViewItem On the Heritage website site the description for H-150's is "solid mahogany" body. I suppose I'd assumed this meant one piece. Is there any way to tell if an H-150 model would be a one-piece or two piece body? Is this random? I know with G* models these days (for Standards, at least) it's a crapshoot. Thanks, in advance. Maybe I am missing something but how can you tell this guitar has a two piece back from this photo? I see only the top and thats the only picture on the add. its a matched top like most les pauls but there is no way to tell what the back is like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slider313 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Maybe I am missing something but how can you tell this guitar has a two piece back from this photo? I see only the top and thats the only picture on the add. its a matched top like most les pauls but there is no way to tell what the back is like. If you scroll over to the right there are more pictures and the last one is the back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guitarjump Posted June 25, 2008 Author Share Posted June 25, 2008 Yes the H-150 in the ad has one of the most blatant two-piece backs I've seen - on any guitar. There's no attempt to match the grain,or blend in. I would expect a 'custom shop' level instrument to be of top-level construction - therefore one piece. It's a lot cheaper to get smaller pieces and glue them together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmb27 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 My 150 is a two piece back .... sounds good .... even when I'm playin' it ;D :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romk Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 My 150 is a two piece back .... sounds good .... even when I'm playin' it ;D :wink: while my H150 is a one piece back and sounds good even when I am playing ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazwell Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 It only matters to the person playing it. If there is a difference in sound, it would take very expensive, highly sensitive equipment to detect a sonic difference that would far surpass anything the human ear could ever detect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffB Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Some of the best sounding old strats Ive played are 2-3 pieces. I honestly dont think theres any difference in tone between 1 piece and multi piece guitars unless theyre plywood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Seacup Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 My first run H-137D is not just a one piece back, it's just one piece! And it sounds great just sitting on the stand. Look at it! LOOK AT IT! Can you hear the sustain?! (OK, it might be time to turn off the coffee maker) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
111518 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I agree that a well-joined two-piece slab of mahogany is probably not going to be much different in its contribution to tone than a one piece slab, but I think this thread provides an interesting example of how attitude shapes perception. We are favorably inclined towards Heritage, so there's little complaint about the difference in construction practice. In most vintage guitar discussions I've heard or read, however, the fact that Norlin went to the pancake body on Les Pauls is generally pointed to as one very clear sign of the beginning of the end for Gibson quality. (...and we have had threads that celebrated the particular contribution of wood to Heritage 150/157 tone.) I'd speculate that the magic glue that allows resonance not to be an issue in this thread lies within this community, not between the two pieces of wood, just as many of our attitudes towards our guitars have more to do with society than with physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guitarjump Posted June 27, 2008 Author Share Posted June 27, 2008 111518 - Very interesting post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectrum13 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Speaking about glue... does Heritage still use hide glue to bind the tops? There is a interview from the book about the McCarty area where Ted remarks about how Paul Smith was the only one who asked what type of glue was used between the maple cap and mahogany. Also, the latest Stew-Mac trade secrets was all about hide glue drying to a crystal hardness vs alternatives being able to stretch. Perhaps it is not how many pieces but rather how they are joined. I have an article from the 1988 chemical & engineering news, "chemistry and the violin" where they examine the woods, varnish, curing, aging and assembly techniques from 16th century Italian artisans. They go into microspic detail. I could email it should anyone be interested or wish to post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.