Jump to content
Heritage Owners Club

Re-Incoming


Recommended Posts

About 10 years ago I bought this guitar from someone in Ohio.  He wasn't a player, but a friend of his recommended he invest in a couple of new guitars at a guitar show in Cincinatti, if I recall right.  This is a Heritage Johnny Smith with an 18" body.  I'd like to tell you a good reason I sold it the next year.  I think it was a matter of money.  I'm not sure.  I sold it to a great guy and a forum member.  Later he bought a couple of other Heritages from me.  Fortunately for me, he agreed to sell the HJS back.

There were two 18" HJS made AFAIK.  Both were in Cincinatti.  Don Dean, of Scotty Moore and Elvis fame, ended up with one.  That one is a natural and is 3 1/4" deep.  The incoming is the traditional 3" deep.

The natural finish one was owned by a friend of mine who had the Floating #3 pickup rebuilt by Kent Armstrong, making it a little hotter.  You can hear a difference.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsM3VeXzpVw

 

This is the incoming sister of the natural.  It's a rose natural and has the standard Floating #3, which to me sounds warmer.

I'm excited!

 

 

HJS.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guitar and case survived intact. It came with a lot of documentation from 9 years ago that the guy I sold it to obtained.

The guy I got it from obtained it from Don Dean, the king of 18" archtops (sorta). Heritage noted that they did only make two of these guitars. Both were made exactly the way they built them at Gibson except the size.

I forgot how low the action will go without buzzing. It's very impressive. I put TI 12s Jazz. The guitar is pretty loud and sounds great.

There is a signed label by Johnny Smith, and there is a second label handwritten saying it is an 18" Johnny Smith and is signed by the four original Heritage Company orders.

I included some quick photos to show the impressive woods. The grain is tighter in the middle and widens at the side. So I had to research as to whether the opinion that tight grain is more responsive. The Heritage old timers and Aaron Cowles said it's a myth. A review of the Internet opinions by good luthiers say no tonal differences, probably because thickness and carving dwarfs any grain tightness factor.

Anyway, I'm happy.

 

 

53663132073_6606f6cdea_c.jpg

53663274244_a19e1c3725_c.jpg

53662046667_34046921ff_c.jpg

53663380365_096df8e5a2_c.jpg

53662046127_50b1178e5a_c.jpg

53663273974_ae7600ce03_c.jpg

HJS.thumb.jpg.e6650eee5330068458a9a2e9ef54ad0c.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I took my Johnny Smith back to Heritage, Ren looked at the Spruce tops grain, which was slightly wide, he said "don't worry it will still sound good". Up to then I hadn't worried or even been aware of the effect grain width could have on the sound. I always listen to Ren. Ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...